Wednesday, April 02, 2014

From Ian:

In Dramatic Gambit, Abbas Dumps U.S.-Brokered Talks and Heads to UN
Back in the Middle East, Palestinian gambits at the UN have been seen as corroding the basic framework of the Israeli-Palestinian peace process. The land-for-peace formula requires the Israelis to give up tangible, functionally irreversible concessions in exchange for Palestinian commitments. The fear has always been that the Palestinians will negotiate only as long as they can extract territory or prisoners, and that they will then pocket what they’ve gained and walk away. Abbas’s moves seem set to confirm those fears.
The bait-and-switch – pocketing three releases and then walking away – seems to prove the point, and had actually been flagged as a possibility by Deputy Defense Minister Danny Danon in recent days. Unilateral moves at the UN also by definition violate Palestinian commitments under the Oslo Accords, which prohibit “any step that will change the status of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip pending the outcome of the permanent status negotiations.” Israel bought and sealed those obligations at the cost of both territory and other functionally irreversible concessions.
The upshot is that the Palestinians seem to be abandoning not just current negotiations, which the Israelis sought to secure with prisoner releases, but the entire Oslo framework, for which the Israelis gave up territory over decades. The result risks deepening skepticism toward the fundamental peace process framework.
Kerry should 'drop the delusions,' says prominent US journalist
Washington Post editorial page deputy editor Jackson Diehl penned a piece Monday titled "John Kerry’s departure from reality."
Among other things, Diehl said the U.S. should "concede that a comprehensive Israeli-Palestinian peace isn’t possible now and look for more modest ways to build the groundwork for a future Palestinian state."
"In short, drop the delusions," Diehl writes.

Diehl's words come several months after Defense Minister Moshe Ya'alon found himself in hot water following comments about Kerry's approach to the Israeli-Palestinian peace process. In January, Yedioth Ahronoth quoted Ya'alon as deriding Kerry's Israeli-Palestinian peace efforts as naive and foolhardy, and calling Kerry "obsessive" and "messianic."
This Arab man is against the release of Israel's Palestinian prisoners
Easy-going and quiet-spoken, Orhan Turk, 37, is an unlikely hard-liner. But as diplomats work feverishly around the clock to salvage the Israeli-Palestinian negotiations, which would include the release of Palestinian prisoners held in Israeli jails, Turk is fervently hoping they’ll fail.
Turk is an Arab Israeli. "We're Muslims," he says, "but just regular" — he prays but is not particularly observant.
Sabriya, his older sister, was Israel's heavy-weight boxing champion, "just like Mike Tyson," Turk says proudly. When he was 12 and she was 21, Sabriya was one of seven people killed by Mahmud and Muhammad Halaby, Gazan brothers dispatched by Hamas to Tel Aviv with explicit instructions to kill Arabs and Jews.

  • Wednesday, April 02, 2014
  • Elder of Ziyon
My RSS feeds were broken over the past few days. Hundreds (maybe thousands) of EoZ fans who use newsreaders like Feedly and who subscribe to email digests did not get to see some good and important posts, and this weekend in particular had some very notable ones.

Here is a roundup of what you may have missed.

A fun Twitter conversation with a terror apologist/anti-Israel leftist 

And its followup:
Where a prominent anti-Israel ideologue makes the mistake of insulting me on Twitter.
Because it would be terrible to actually sponsor something that makes Jews look like they ever suffered.
A tour de force by Bob Knot, and the most popular post of the week.
Saving the world, again.

The paper of record.
Amazing how that works out.
Darn sheep!

But I thought they had nothing against Jews!







But who listens to what they say, anyway?






  • Wednesday, April 02, 2014
  • Elder of Ziyon
The International Criminal Court has a list of crimes that are within its mandate to prosecute. The general categories of these crimes are:


  • The crime of genocide;
  • Crimes against humanity;
  • War crimes;
  • The crime of aggression. (this has not yet been defined.)


The Rome Statute details the specific crimes that are applied. For genocide:

  • Killing members of the group;
  • Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
  • Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
  • Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
  • Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

The first seven crimes against humanity:
  • (a) Murder;
  • (b) Extermination;
  • (c) Enslavement;
  • (d) Deportation or forcible transfer of population;
  • (e) Imprisonment or other severe deprivation of physical liberty in violation of fundamental rules of international law;
  • (f) Torture;
  • (g) Rape, sexual slavery, enforced prostitution, forced pregnancy, enforced sterilization, or any other form of sexual violence of comparable gravity;

War crimes include such obvious examples as:

  • Wilful killing;
  • Torture or inhuman treatment, including biological experiments;
  • Wilfully causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or health;
  • Extensive destruction and appropriation of property, not justified by military necessity and carried out unlawfully and wantonly;
  • Compelling a prisoner of war or other protected person to serve in the forces of a hostile Power;
  • Wilfully depriving a prisoner of war or other protected person of the rights of fair and regular trial;
  • Unlawful deportation or transfer or unlawful confinement;
  • Taking of hostages.
  • Intentionally directing attacks against the civilian population as such or against individual civilians not taking direct part in hostilities;
  • Intentionally directing attacks against civilian objects, that is, objects which are not military objectives;
  • Intentionally directing attacks against personnel, installations, material, units or vehicles involved in a humanitarian assistance or peacekeeping mission in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, as long as they are entitled to the protection given to civilians or civilian objects under the international law of armed conflict;
  • Intentionally launching an attack in the knowledge that such attack will cause incidental loss of life or injury to civilians or damage to civilian objects or widespread, long-term and severe damage to the natural environment which would be clearly excessive in relation to the concrete and direct overall military advantage anticipated;
  • Attacking or bombarding, by whatever means, towns, villages, dwellings or buildings which are undefended and which are not military objectives;
  • Killing or wounding a combatant who, having laid down his arms or having no longer means of defence, has surrendered at discretion;

You can see a pattern - the worst most heinous war crimes are listed.

But among all these terrible crimes that are spelled out explicitly by the Rome Statute is this one:


  • The transfer, directly or indirectly, by the Occupying Power of parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies.


Keen eyed observers will note that this is a huge amplification of the Fourth Geneva Convention, which stated "The Occupying Power shall not deport or transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies." By adding "directly or indirectly" it is obvious that the Rome Statute has changed what was originally intended to put a stop to the WWII practice of states actively moving part of their unwilling population into a territory, and instead it was designed for one reason only: to explicitly call Jews moving to their ancestral lands a war crime.

There is no better example of a sui generis law than this.

How did the idea of Jews voluntarily moving to almost completely empty spaces and building houses turn into a war crime on the par of torture or taking hostages? How could  the writers of the Statute allow, as far as I can tell, this to be the only part that is not mentioned explicitly by the Geneva Conventions?

It all started in 1999, when the Rome Statute was being drafted. On August 10, 1999, a group of Arab nations -Algeria, Bahrain, Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, Morocco, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, the Sudan, the Syrian Arab Republic, Tunisia, the United Arab Emirates and Yemen - drafted this text to be added to the Statute:

The perpetrator, directly or indirectly:
(a) Induced, facilitated, participated or helped in any manner in the transfer of civilian population of the Occupying Power into the territory it occupies.
Given the source, it is quite obvious that this was meant to create an international law that would only be used against Israel....when the time was right.

 The US fought against it and proposed its own wording that would limit it to real war crimes:

1. That the act took place in the course of a military occupation with respect to territory where authority of a hostile army was actually established and exercised.
2. That the accused intended to effect the compulsory transfer, on a large scale, of parts of the population of the Occupying Power into such occupied territory.
3. That the accused effected such transfer of nationals of the Occupying Power into such occupied territory.
4. That the accused intended that such transfer would endanger the separate identity of the local population in such occupied territory.
5. That the transfer worsened the economic situation of the local population and endangered their separate identity. 
6. That the transfer was without, and the accused knew it was without, lawful justification or excuse. 
The US is clearly interpreting the Fourth Geneva Convention Article 49  according to its original written intent, not the joke interpretation that Israel-haters have been using that has now gained currency.

Being a committee, the US text was rejected and the Arab text was watered down, with the result being the wording we showed above.

The Geneva Convention definition  was never tested in any international court as to whether it could apply to Israel and the disputed territories. The ICC's Rome Statute, however, has elevated what was clearly not the intent of Geneva into defining "Jews building houses" as a war crime.

The Arab countries that sponsored this change to Geneva couldn't directly prosecute Israel in the ICC, because it is not their right to do so. Only a state member of the ICC that is the victim of "war crimes" can do that.

Now when you fast forward to today, where Mahmoud Abbas is renewing his threats to go to the ICC, we see the culmination of a process that began in 1999 - during the Oslo process, when it appeared that there might be a Palestinian Arab state sooner rather than later. But even so, the moves by the PLO to get accepted as a state by the UN had this specific idea in mind.

Anyone looking at the situation today can see how the Arab initiative of 1999 was meant to play out eventually - a goal that is now in reach.

It is obvious that this was a long-term strategy by the Arab states to damn Israel. This is only one example of Arab strategy and patience, attributes that the West doesn't understand.

Their goal to destroy Israel is not meant to play out in months or years, but over decades. Western-style democracies think instead in terms of sound bites and election cycles, and they simply cannot think the way that Arabs do.

Over time, this proves to be a fatal shortcoming.
  • Wednesday, April 02, 2014
  • Elder of Ziyon
From AFP:
More than 150,000 people have been killed in Syria since the conflict began in March 2011, a monitoring group said in a new toll released on Tuesday.

The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said it had documented the deaths of 150,344 people, 51,212 of them civilians, including nearly 7,985 children.

The group said 37,781 members of the armed opposition had been killed in the fighting, including militants from the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, and al-Qaeda affiliate al-Nusra Front.

A total of 58,480 regime forces, including more than 35,000 soldiers had also been killed.

Among those killed fighting on the government side were 364 members of Lebanon's Shiite Hezbollah movement, the Observatory added.

Another 2,871 people were recorded as having died but their identities remained unknown, the group said.
But it isn't a high priority. Much more important to pressure Israel to release murderers for "peace."

Tuesday, April 01, 2014

  • Tuesday, April 01, 2014
  • Elder of Ziyon
From Egypt Independent:

Omar Abul Maged, a 31-year-old farmer, never imagined he would one day be in prison for naming his donkey after the defense minister.

However, the Qena Misdemeanor Court has now sentenced him to a year over charges of “humiliating the military” for naming his donkey “Sisi,” after the recently resigned military chief Abdel Fatah al-Sisi who is due to run for presidential elections after overthrowing Egypt's first democratically elected president Morsy on 3 July.

Abdul Maged's satirical way of protesting against the military-led government began in 20 September 2013 when the pro-Morsy Abul Maged was riding his donkey through his village, called Ashraf in Qena province, covering the donkey’s body with a poster of al-Sisi and putting a military-style cap over the donkey’s head.

The police, when notified of this act from anti-Morsy villagers, arrested Abul Maged along with his donkey and after six months in custody, the court issued its verdict on Sunday.
What is the donkey's sentence?
From Ian:

The ISM: Now Recruiting Human shields
If you've got a hankering to be used , abused and even sacrificed by terror supporters, this is your chance. Training will be held (where else?) in Berkeley.
The head of the Northern California International Solidarity movement Paul Larudee has been under fire recently by his anti-Israel peers, who have accused him of everything from financial impropriety, to political showboating. He has been kept at arms length by those alarmed by his allegiance to Iran, his support of violence as well as his ties to notorious anti-Semite Gilad Atzmon. Its not clear whether the disagreement is truly philosophical in nature, or if its simply politically expedient to distance oneself from those with clear ties to terror.
Paul has been desperately trying to recapture a place for himself in the anti-Israel movement Its hard to feel sorry for Larudee, who helped organize the failed Flotilla, and the failed Global March to Jerusalem.
Anne Bayefsky: Obama's foreign policy failures lead to disaster at UN
Then consider the Council’s resolution on the “Syrian Golan.” The Council declared that it was “deeply concerned at the suffering of Syrian civilians in the occupied Syrian Golan due to the…violation of human rights by Israel.” The resolution didn’t mention the suffering of Syrian civilians due to the violation of human rights by Syria.
The fact that Syrians flee to the Golan in order to be saved by Israeli doctors from the wounds inflicted by their own government was also mysteriously missing. The Syrian Golan resolution even complained that because of Israel, Syrians are failing to visit “their relatives in the Syrian motherland.” In the UN human rights world, only the United States voted against.
Behavior at the Council does clarify that the demonization of Israel at the U.N. is really about denying Jewish self-determination and encouraging the ultimate destruction of a Jewish state.
Carlos the Jackal fined for anti-Semitic comments
The international terrorist known as Carlos the Jackal was ordered to pay a fine for anti-Semitic comments directed at a prison official in France.
The Venezuelan, whose name is Ilich Ramirez Sanchez, was fined $3,500 on Monday for calling the female prison official “Israeli,” a “Zionist” and a “dirty Jew” during his appeal last May. He denies using the term dirty Jew, the French news agency AFP reported.

  • Tuesday, April 01, 2014
  • Elder of Ziyon
Literally every day that a few dozen Jews talk a tour of the Temple Mount, the Arab press has front-page headlines about how "extremists" and "settlers" are 'storming," "breaking into Al Aqsa" or "desecrating" the area.

Today's quiet visit was decried by Ma'an and Free Palestine as well as media in Egypt and the UAE - dozens of articles altogether.

Here are some of the photos of the terrible event:


I especially like the three violent extremists in the front of this group:

One Arab press source said that the "settlers" were walking around "provocatively"and that as soon as they exited the area they erupted in "Talmudic dances."

As reported in the last linkdump, a Waqf official reportedly assaulted one of these "stormers".

  • Tuesday, April 01, 2014
  • Elder of Ziyon
PMW reports:

The Palestinian Authority's only reason for agreeing to and continuing the peace negotiations with Israel is to bring about the release of prisoners, Fatah's spokesman Ahmad Assaf has indicated. Stating that the PA "blackmailed" Israel to release the prisoners, Assaf explained that by virtue of the PA's membership in the UN, the PA is able to threaten Israel with taking it to the International Criminal Court. Assaf maintains that to prevent the PA from doing so, Israel agreed to release 104 prisoners, most of them serving life sentences for murder.



Our membership in the UN is also a weapon. And that's an important card. It's a weapon that's in our pocket. I didn't use it on day one. I didn't say as soon as I got membership in the UN, that I want to go to the International Criminal Court - no. We've been waving it around for two years now: We've obtained the release of the prisoners, we blackmailed [Israel], that is, in quotation marks, and we've taken important positions because we have a card that we're waving around.
[Official PA TV, March 19, 2014)

Nabil Shaath, Fatah MP and Central Committee member and Commissioner of International Relations stated in November 2013 that "due to the prisoners (of whom only half have been released) [parentheses in source], we haven't stopped negotiations and haven't petitioned the UN." [Al-Hayat Al-Jadida, Nov. 30, 2013]

Fatah Central Committee member Nabil Shaath said that [the day] the State of Palestine obtained recognition as a non-member state of the UN was without doubt a day that led to a great development in the world's view of our people's rights, after this [Palestinian] people decided to declare its statehood in the 1967 borders with Jerusalem as its capital. Likewise, he noted that there is much to gain from this recognition, from which we will strive to benefit soon, by joining all international agreements and institutions that require no more than a request to join, and this will be translated shortly into a request to join 35 international conventions, the first of which is the Rome Convention.

Shaath emphasized that the leadership did not move forward on joining international organizations [until now] for one reason - which is ensuring the release of the remaining veteran prisoners who were arrested by Israel before the Oslo Accords, and that the leadership is awaiting their release."

[Al-Hayat Al-Jadida, Dec. 2, 2013]

We pretty much knew all this already:


But that won't stop the US from pressuring Israel to continue the facade.


From Ian:

Kerry’s “Last Chance” Diplomacy Implodes
Continually crying that this is the “last chance” for peace is not only inaccurate—diplomats have been saying the same thing for decades and have always been wrong, since peace will come the day the Palestinians give up their illusions about re-writing history and not one day sooner—it is also the sort of sentiment that rationalizes the actions of extremists who don’t want peace on any terms.
It is true that many Israelis worry about the long-term consequences of the current impasse which leaves the West Bank in limbo while Hamas-ruled Gaza functions as the independent Palestinian state in all but name. But as Diehl says, the alternative to Kerry’s apocalyptic warnings was an embrace of the reality of a conflict that couldn’t be solved but might be managed. Measures aimed at giving the Palestinians a bigger stake in an improved economy and better governance wouldn’t have cut the Gordian knot of Middle East peace but would have provided Abbas and his Fatah Party a reason to keep a lid on the territories as well as more of an incentive to think about preparing the way for eventual peace. Instead, Kerry has brought Abbas to the brink where he feels he has no alternative but to give the back of his hand to a negotiation that he never wanted to be part of in the first place. If violence in the form of a third intifada (perhaps funded in part by Iran via aid to Islamic Jihad or Hamas) follows, then it should be remembered that it was Kerry who set a potentially tragic series of events in motion.
Peace process as an obstacle to peace
The "peace process" has been turned – by the Israelis, Palestinians, Americans and in some sense the Europeans too – into a sort of independent diplomatic entity, whose ethical and political rhetoric is more important than its deeds, whose outward appearance conceals not only real inaction but sometimes even worse – deeds which clearly contradict peace itself. The peace process deludes us, and therefore calms us too, to believe that peace will certainly come. It induces tolerance which is eventually complete passivity.
For the sake of illustration, let us recall the short and efficient peace process between Israel and Egypt, two countries which waged major, bloody wars against each other. This peace process began dramatically with Egyptian President Sadat's visit to Israel in November 1977,and less than a year later the sides already agreed upon the main principles at Camp David. A withdrawal, demilitarization, uprooting communities and opening embassies. The agreement itself was signed several months later. And this peace agreement has lasted more than 35 years now.
Suddenly, it’s 1947
Recently I had a discussion with a visitor from Mars. He said that he found it difficult to understand the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. It went like this:
VFM: What do the Israelis want?
Me: They want the Palestinians to stop trying to kill them. In return, they will give them some of their very small homeland for a new Arab state. But they can’t get the Palestinians to agree to take it.
VFM: The Palestinians want a state, and the Israelis want to give it to them? But why won’t the Palestinians take it?
Me: Because they won’t take it unless the Israelis agree that the part that they don’t give them belongs to the Palestinians too.

VFM: That doesn’t sound fair. I suppose the Palestinians must be very powerful in order to demand so much.
Me: No, actually Israel is much stronger militarily and economically.
VFM: Then what’s the point in talking to them?
Me: Ask John Kerry.

  • Tuesday, April 01, 2014
  • Elder of Ziyon
A writer for Jordan's Addastour has discovered that Jews have been wrong all along.

Ismail al-Sharif reveals to the world that Solomon's Temple was never in Jerusalem. It was built halfway around the world, in the Solomon Islands.

His proof?

There is a video of the islanders saying Shema, which i found:



And some people say that Solomon's Temple is in the middle of a jungle in the island of Malaita.



Al-Sharif notes that this is not so far-fetched. After all, the Koran tells us, King Solomon controlled demons who could whisk him to anywhere in the world.

The writer notes that there are other theories as to where the Temple was - Yemen, Saudi Arabia, and he claims a Jewish encyclopedia his father read once said it was on Mount Zion outside Jerusalem built of wood covered in fabrics (which sounds like someone got the Temple and the Mishkan/Tabernacle mixed up.) Either way, he asserts, the idea of a Temple in Jerusalem is a complete myth and the Jews made it up in order to expel the Muslims from their third holiest spot.

So he wouldn't mind if archaeologists explore the area, right?

Well, not quite. Al Sharif's suggestion is that the Arab League pay for archaeologists to find proof of the Temple anywhere in the world outside Jerusalem, in order to prove once and for all that Jews are liars.

Arab media - where every day is April Fools Day.

In case you are interested, a journalist went to the Solomon Islands a couple of years ago to track down the story:

There's one man in particular, named Frank Diafae , who lives in a village called Fuondo, a little north of the capital, and he considers himself to be a keeper of this archaeological site that he thinks contains evidence of some Jew that might have arrived, he says some 2,700 years ago or so - it's quite an elaborate theology, ethno-theology. But he's probably the most vocal proponent of the idea that some Jew arrived on the island a long time ago. He doesn't have specific archaeological, what we would call modern scientific evidence of this, but he certainly believes it. And what's interesting, when you travel across the island, is to find it echoed in other places, similar mythologies or things that where people talk about ancestors. And it's easy to understand with Jews having a kind of a lineal descent and an oral history that's very powerful. The idea of ancestors which is common in many religions. But I just felt that they had quite an affinity.

I went with Frank who led me to his Temple site, which is definitely an archaeological site. There are rocks piled up there, about four hours walk into the jungle, a very difficult walk in fact and there was clearly a settlement there or some kind. Really nobody credible has spent any time looking at it, but it was certainly striking to see that there was something there that he was convinced was evidence of a mythological past.

...
  • Tuesday, April 01, 2014
  • Elder of Ziyon
In 2011, the Egyptian government banned export of palm fronds, claiming that it was meant to protect the trees from overharvesting. However, it was obvious from the statements of officials at the time that the move was aimed specifically at Jews who require the branches, called lulavim, for the fall holiday of Sukkot.

At the time the harvesters of palm trees complained at how much money they would lose.

It appears that they decided to do something about it.

According to Egyptian media today, a lulav smuggling ring has been busted.

The Agriculture Ministry found evidence that lulavim were smuggled to Jordan, under the label "mangoes" or "accessories." From Jordan they were then sent to either Israel or to something called the "Israeli Center" in New York.

Six officials responsible for quarantining illegal exports have been suspended from their jobs.

The articles explain, quite wrongly, that Jews decorate their homes and synagogues with the palm fronds, which they say symbolize the palm fronds the Jews took with them out of Egypt.


  • Tuesday, April 01, 2014
  • Elder of Ziyon
During these past few months, BDS has jumped the shark.

Last month's "Israel Apartheid Week" was a bust; the tide on college campuses is turning against the Israel-hating fanatics, a major campaign to stop The Rolling Stones and Neil Young from playing in Israel failed miserably, the Sodastream/Scarlett Johansson episode blew up in BDSers' faces, and the major players who keep pushing BDS have found themselves more marginalized. Even Israel's most strident critics are also criticizing BDS fanatics.  Hell, even Islamic Jihad wants to do business with Israel.

Up until now, the PA leadership has been against BDS as well.

But the same leaders who realized 50 years too late that they should have accepted the 1947 partition plan, with their exquisite sense of timing, may be about to board the BDS ship - right when it is starting to sink.

From Middle East Monitor:

Mohammed Shtayyeh, a member of Fatah's Executive Committee, has called for a full local, regional and international economic boycott of Israel to oblige it to withdraw from the occupied Palestinians territories.

"Israel has to pay the price for its occupation in order to feel its burden," he said while delivering a speech at a conference held to support the Palestinian crops against settlement food production in the local market.

Since the Palestinian and Israeli economies are interrelated, Shtayyeh called upon the Palestinian Authority leadership to take tangible steps regarding the boycott. "It is not possible for us to call for the world to boycott Israel, while our annual imports from Israel are worth $5 billion," he said.

This means that, "We import 90 per cent of our needs from Israel." He also said that 70 per cent of Palestinian exports go to Israel.

Shtayyeh gave examples of other boycotts from recent history, such as Indians who boycotted British goods, African Americans who boycotted buses in Montgomery in the state of Alabama, as well as the Arab boycott of Israel during the 1987 Intifada.

For the time being, Shtayyeh called for spreading awareness among Arab businessmen who invest in Israel without knowing that it harms Palestinian interests. He said that there are 596 international firms, including many owned by Arabs, investing in Israel.

He also hailed the popular international efforts in raising the tactic of boycott. "This has started to give positive responses," he said. "Dozens of European and American firms have announced their boycott of Israel," adding that, "a large number of artists have refrained from performing in Israel."

Shtayyeh is getting his news from the BDS dinosaur sites. Indeed, in 2010, the Pixies canceled their show in Israel as a protest of Israeli policies, in what was hailed as a major BDS victory.

This year, they are playing in Israel.

Timing is everything, but since Fatah leaders refuse to read any news from sources that contradict what they want to believe, they are always going to be a few years behind in seeing what is happening right in front of them.


AddToAny

EoZ Book:"Protocols: Exposing Modern Antisemitism"

Printfriendly

EoZTV Podcast

Podcast URL

Subscribe in podnovaSubscribe with FeedlyAdd to netvibes
addtomyyahoo4Subscribe with SubToMe

search eoz

comments

Speaking

translate

E-Book

For $18 donation








Sample Text

EoZ's Most Popular Posts in recent years

Hasbys!

Elder of Ziyon - حـكـيـم صـهـيـون



This blog may be a labor of love for me, but it takes a lot of effort, time and money. For over 19 years and 40,000 articles I have been providing accurate, original news that would have remained unnoticed. I've written hundreds of scoops and sometimes my reporting ends up making a real difference. I appreciate any donations you can give to keep this blog going.

Donate!

Donate to fight for Israel!

Monthly subscription:
Payment options


One time donation:

subscribe via email

Follow EoZ on Twitter!

Interesting Blogs

Blog Archive